Home
articles
Archaeology Breaking News Business Crime Cyberspace Orbit Environment Health News Media News Music Op-Ed Paranormal Police State Politics Prison USA Religion Science News Support Our Troops Technology U.S. News UFOs Weird News World News
books
Alien Earth Ancient Mysteries Banned Books Biographies Classics Conspiracy Curmy's Library Current Events Elaine's Library Fantasy Health Historical Fiction History Horror Humor Literary Acid Magic Montauk Project Music New Age Non Fiction Paranormal Religion & Spirituality Science Science Fiction UFOs
forum
gallery
A Thousand Words Alien Earth Boston 2013 Burning Man Crop Circles Enhanced Interrogation Ghosts Gulf Oil Spill Historical Photos January 6, 2021 Natural Disasters Oceans Places Politics Protests Sept. 11 Space UFOs Wildlife
jukebox
Alternative Blues Celtic Classic Country Classical Disco! Electronica Goth Grunge Hippy Jazz Jazz Fusion Meditation Metal Neue Deutsche Härte New Wave Oldies Pop Progressive Rock Psychedelic Rock Punk R & B Reggae Rock Showtunes Swing Thrash
links
Computers Health Humor Media Religion Research UK News US News Veterans' Resources World News
movies
Alien Earth B-Movies Classic Horror Comedy Current Events Elaine's Favorites Fantasy Horror Paranormal Science Science Fiction Thriller UFOs
music
Alternative Blues Celtic Classic Country Classical Disco! Electronica Goth Grunge Hippy Jazz Jazz Fusion Meditation Metal Neue Deutsche Härte New Wave Oldies Pop Progressive Rock Psychedelic Rock Punk R & B Reggae Rock Showtunes Swing Thrash
topics
UFOs
UK
USA
videos
Conspiracy Cyberspace Orbit Humor News Propaganda Science UFOs Unsolved Mysteries

Forum

Anonymous Coward 4/22/2025 12:31 pm GMT	Lancaster Mayor Wants To Kill People Who Don't Own Property: 'Free Fentanyl' And 'a Purge' Lancaster Mayor Wants to Kill People Who Don't Own Property: 'Free fentanyl' and 'a purge' Mon Apr 21, 2025 The mayor of Lancaster, Rex Parris, has ignited a controversy after musing during a council meeting that one approach to homelessness would be to "give them free fentanyl … all the fentanyl they want. Read More Purge !
Nowie 4/23/2025 6:33 am GMT	RE: Lancaster Mayor Wants To Kill People Who Don't Own Property: 'Free Fentanyl' And 'a Purge' Mayor Parris makes interesting points. As a trial lawyer he's seen the effects of crime on his county, and "purging" the criminals who are homeless would be popular among the "Middle Class" as well as the "Aspirational Middle Class" leading to entrenched service to his county... The question then becomes... Is this a good thing? It's good for the county's law enforcement, tourism, community, business community and good for the county's bottom line in reducing the homeless population. It's hard to debate in favour of convicted criminals, that they really belong in the "community"... However, the underclasses tend to spook the "Middle Class" into action and some crime is necessary to invoke the need for a surveillance state. Property crimes are ideal, because they spur demand for newer and better stuff, leading to a bolstering of the economy. However, violent crimes lead to trauma and although the psychologists like trauma because it creates demand for their services, but this isn't ideal because of reduced or debilitated output of the "productive class" who have witnessed or suffered trauma. Fortunately, hardened criminals like drugs like Fentanyl and it would be an effective way to reduce homelessness among this unfortunate class of people who are unrehabilatable. One could make the argument that a merciful ending high as a kite on Fentanyl would be preferable to releasing them and inflicting them on the general population. Solely as a humane way to alleviate societal suffering as well as that of the drug addict. Simply not providing Naloxone to the homeless would resolve the issue and a tariff caused economic crisis would serve as the trigger for the Governmental policy. Are drug addicts "Human" and deserving "Human rights"? That depends on the benefit one gets from moral support of supporting them, or lack there of. It's a tricky situation, but easily resolved with sociopathic tendancies. All "They" need is to craft the suitable excuse, and we all know "They" will.

Anonymous Coward

4/22/2025 12:31 pm GMT

Lancaster Mayor Wants To Kill People Who Don't Own Property: 'Free Fentanyl' And 'a Purge'

Lancaster Mayor Wants to Kill People Who Don't Own Property: 'Free fentanyl' and 'a purge'
Mon Apr 21, 2025
The mayor of Lancaster, Rex Parris, has ignited a controversy after musing during a council meeting that one approach to homelessness would be to "give them free fentanyl … all the fentanyl they want.
Read More

Purge !
smiley

Nowie

4/23/2025 6:33 am GMT

RE: Lancaster Mayor Wants To Kill People Who Don't Own Property: 'Free Fentanyl' And 'a Purge'

Mayor Parris makes interesting points. As a trial lawyer he's seen the effects of crime on his county, and "purging" the criminals who are homeless would be popular among the "Middle Class" as well as the "Aspirational Middle Class" leading to entrenched service to his county...

The question then becomes... Is this a good thing? It's good for the county's law enforcement, tourism, community, business community and good for the county's bottom line in reducing the homeless population.

It's hard to debate in favour of convicted criminals, that they really belong in the "community"...

However, the underclasses tend to spook the "Middle Class" into action and some crime is necessary to invoke the need for a surveillance state.

Property crimes are ideal, because they spur demand for newer and better stuff, leading to a bolstering of the economy.

However, violent crimes lead to trauma and although the psychologists like trauma because it creates demand for their services, but this isn't ideal because of reduced or debilitated output of the "productive class" who have witnessed or suffered trauma.

Fortunately, hardened criminals like drugs like Fentanyl and it would be an effective way to reduce homelessness among this unfortunate class of people who are unrehabilatable. One could make the argument that a merciful ending high as a kite on Fentanyl would be preferable to releasing them and inflicting them on the general population. Solely as a humane way to alleviate societal suffering as well as that of the drug addict.

Simply not providing Naloxone to the homeless would resolve the issue and a tariff caused economic crisis would serve as the trigger for the Governmental policy.

Are drug addicts "Human" and deserving "Human rights"? That depends on the benefit one gets from moral support of supporting them, or lack there of.

It's a tricky situation, but easily resolved with sociopathic tendancies. All "They" need is to craft the suitable excuse, and we all know "They" will.
smiley